Bush's Judicial Appointment Litmus Test

Last night, Bush claimed to not have a political litmus test for judicial appointments to the Supreme Court. Then he gave an example of his multilayered litmus test. Maybe this is the bullshitmas test.

His test cases are Dredd Scott and Newsom's "Under God" case. His personal test is whether in the next election they'll vote for him.

He started with a defiant, "I'm not tellin'." A hem, a haw, a bullshit, a strict constructionist.

A God fearin' fundamentalist Christian. Who would not vote for slavery.

WHAT???! How the hell did that question get asked? I think that one was settled twenty generations ago. Who wants to challenge that one? Answer me that Mr. Riddler.

No litmus test except for how I agree with how they interpret the Constitution.

Disturbing. The State has no business promoting a job opening only to Republican neo-conservative Christians, or monotheists who don't believe in Allah, according to the First Amendment.

I thought that we issued some other Amendments which also answered the equality issue. That is our Constitution, George. You can't conveniently ignore the Amendments or force your own.

I really hope this picture is becoming clear to everybody. Last doubt time is coming. Last chance to take advantage of growing dissonance and weak undoubt regarding the clash of belief and reality.

Bush also claimed that we have not lost any rights under the PATRIOT Act. If Brandon Mayfield has lost his rights, I have also lost mine. Kerry understands. He promotes changing it to bring it in line with our individual rights.

Who can, in good conscience, vote for this man?